He was not sure how researchers using those products might be affected. UCSC spokesman Tim Stephens said Santa Cruz Biotechnology has been a supplier of biotech products for a small number of campus researchers, with purchases for the current fiscal year totaling $18,000. It’s unclear whether the company complied with the deadline. 15 at Santa Cruz Biotechnology’s request and set a March 31 deadline for the company to provide evidence. Then Santa Cruz Biotechnology stopped fighting the USDA.Īdministrative Law Judge Janice Bullard rescheduled an April 5 hearing for Aug. Santa Cruz Biotechnology, founded in 1991 by John and Brenda Stephenson and privately held, is headquartered in Dallas with offices in Santa Cruz, and Paso Robles and Sun Valley, Idaho and global sales locations in Heidelberg and Shanghai.Ī hearing on the complaints took place in August, with another set for April this year. Inquiries left by the Sentinel on the Santa Cruz Biotechnology media line were not returned, and attorney Mark Lynch of Covington & Burling in Washington, D.C., who signed the May 19 settlement for the company, did not respond to a request seeking comment. The order will be posted at Oaljdecisions.dm.
The company, the city’s 12th largest employer with 152 employees reported as of September, did not admit or deny allegations of wrongdoing in the May 19 consent order signed by Administrative Law Judge Bobbie McCartney. Department of Agriculture that goats and rabbits at its Santa Cruz facility were mistreated. SANTA CRUZ > Santa Cruz Biotechnology, one of the world’s largest suppliers of antibodies for research, has agreed to pay a $3.5 million penalty, give up its animal dealer license and close its research lab to settle allegations by the U.S.
0 kommentar(er)
